Should we try to carry over any sort of good/featured article classification? Or any other ranking for article quality? I feel like trying to go through the process of reviewing articles and all that is a huge amount of overhead that we don't really need here. We don't have the machinery and automation to do all that stuff. We could preserve the quality assessment stuff and just leave it up to individual editors to decide. Since we won't be as stringent about sources it's not so crucial. I would also be okay with removing it entirely. I don't think most hobby/gaming wikis bother with that stuff.
What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
- All2 posts
- General2 posts
Sort by
Card Layout
Currently the scope is vaguely defined as "everything related to Dungeons and Dragons." But I'm not sure how far that goes. This question was spawned by a redlink I saw to role-playing video games. I already created the article for role-playing game, with some of the content from the original wp article trimmed, and I'm pretty sure I want to add the video game article too, but I'm not sure where the line will end up being. Open to thoughts and ideas on it.
(Edited by Torchiest)